Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News And Articles.
Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
Cuban-American lawmakers have voiced strong opposition to the progressive movement to eliminate the Monroe Doctrine. The two-century-old policy has been used to justify U.S. interventionism in Latin America, but progressive lawmakers and activists have argued that the doctrine has been historically used to perpetuate corruption and inequality in the region.
South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, a Cuban-American and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, voiced his opposition to the progressive movement citing it as a “terrible idea” and an “imperialistic doctrine” that the U.S. has used for too long. Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida, another Cuban-American lawmaker, echoed Graham’s sentiments, citing the Monroe Doctrine as a way for the United States to protect its national security interests and guard against undue influence from foreign governments.
Cuban-Americans have a vested interest in the Monroe Doctrine, considering the U.S. trade embargo with Cuba. While the left has for decades wanted to eliminate the doctrine as a way to end what they argue are “imperialistic policies,” Cuban-American lawmakers have argued that the doctrine is necessary to ensure American security interests and that the Cuban embargo is still valid due to the oppressive government in Havana.
In conclusion, Cuban-American lawmakers have long been a vocal opponent of the progressive movement to abolish the Monroe Doctrine, citing the United States’ right to national security concerns and Cuban embargo. While the progressive movement has made clear its stance against the doctrine, Cuban-Americans feel the country still needs it in order to protect American interests and preserve its hard-won independence.